48 research outputs found

    Aphasia after Stroke: the SPEAK Study

    Get PDF
    Aphasia is a disorder of the production and comprehension of written and spoken language as a result of acquired brain damage. This damage is located in the dominant hemisphere, which is the left hemisphere for nearly all the right-handers and for about 70% of the left-handers. The evolvement of aphasia is usually rapid if caused by a head injury or stroke, but can also evolve slowly as a consequence of a brain tumor, infection, or dementia. The most common cause of aphasia is a stroke. The number of people living with aphasia in the Netherlands is approximately 30,000. Every year, about 9,600 new cases of aphasia after stroke occur. The first and main question of patients and their family in the acute stage of stroke is whether the symptoms will decrease, and the patient will ever be able to speak and comprehend as before the stroke again. The severity of aphasia after stroke ranges from having difficulties with infrequent words, complex sentences and texts, to being completely unable to speak, comprehend, read, or write. The impact on one’s ability to communicate is devastating, not only for the patients with aphasia but also for their family and friends. Patients with aphasia are no longer sufficiently capable of expressing and clarifying their thoughts, wishes, and needs, which puts an aphasic patient at a higher risk for depression. Ninety percent of persons with aphasia feel socially isolated. Stroke patients with aphasia also have a higher mortality rate and a worse rehabilitation outcome than stroke patients without aphasia. In this thesis, I address the natural course and prognosis of aphasia after stroke in a large Dutch multicenter prospective study, the Sequential Prognostic Evaluation of Aphasia after stroKe study, known as the SPEAK study

    Recovery of linguistic deficits in stroke patients: a three-year-follow-up study

    Get PDF
    In a three-year-follow-up study aphasic patients (n=17) received the ScreeLing, a screeningstest for semantic, phonological and syntactic processing, the Token Test and an interview at 2-4 days, 9-12 days, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months and 3 years post onset. The greatest improvement on all measures occurred between 9-12 days and 2 months post onset. The severity at 2 months post onset was decisive for the final outcome at 3 years p.o

    Screening tests for aphasia in patients with stroke: a systematic review

    Get PDF
    Aphasia has a large impact on the quality of life and adds significantly to the costs of stroke care. Early recognition of aphasia in stroke patients is important for prognostication and well-timed treatment planning. We aimed to identify available screening tests for differentiating between aphasic and non-aphasic stroke patients, and to evaluate test accuracy, reliability, and feasibility. We searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO for published studies on screening tests aimed at assessing aphasia in stroke patients. The reference lists of the selected articles were scan

    Theory of mind in utterance interpretation: the case from clinical pragmatics

    Get PDF
    The cognitive basis of utterance interpretation is an area that continues to provoke intense theoretical debate among pragmatists. That utterance interpretation involves some type of mind-reading or theory of mind (ToM) is indisputable. However, theorists are divided on the exact nature of this ToM-based mechanism. In this paper, it is argued that the only type of ToM-based mechanism that can adequately represent the cognitive basis of utterance interpretation is one which reflects the rational, intentional, holistic character of interpretation. Such a ToM-based mechanism is supported on conceptual and empirical grounds. Empirical support for this view derives from the study of children and adults with pragmatic disorders. Specifically, three types of clinical case are considered. In the first case, evidence is advanced which indicates that individuals with pragmatic disorders exhibit deficits in reasoning and the use of inferences. These deficits compromise the ability of children and adults with pragmatic disorders to comply with the rational dimension of utterance interpretation

    Assessing and mapping language, attention and executive multidimensional deficits in stroke aphasia.

    Get PDF
    There is growing awareness that aphasia following a stroke can include deficits in other cognitive functions and that these are predictive of certain aspects of language function, recovery and rehabilitation. However, data on attentional and executive (dys)functions in individuals with stroke aphasia are still scarce and the relationship to underlying lesions is rarely explored. Accordingly in this investigation, an extensive selection of standardized non-verbal neuropsychological tests was administered to 38 individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia, in addition to detailed language testing and MRI. To establish the core components underlying the variable patients' performance, behavioural data were explored with rotated principal component analyses, first separately for the non-verbal and language tests, then in a combined analysis including all tests. Three orthogonal components for the non-verbal tests were extracted, which were interpreted as shift-update, inhibit-generate and speed. Three components were also extracted for the language tests, representing phonology, semantics and speech quanta. Individual continuous scores on each component were then included in a voxel-based correlational methodology analysis, yielding significant clusters for all components. The shift-update component was associated with a posterior left temporo-occipital and bilateral medial parietal cluster, the inhibit-generate component was mainly associated with left frontal and bilateral medial frontal regions, and the speed component with several small right-sided fronto-parieto-occipital clusters. Two complementary multivariate brain-behaviour mapping methods were also used, which showed converging results. Together the results suggest that a range of brain regions are involved in attention and executive functioning, and that these non-language domains play a role in the abilities of patients with chronic aphasia. In conclusion, our findings confirm and extend our understanding of the multidimensionality of stroke aphasia, emphasize the importance of assessing non-verbal cognition in this patient group and provide directions for future research and clinical practice. We also briefly compare and discuss univariate and multivariate methods for brain-behaviour mapping

    Executive control in frontal lesion aphasia: Does verbal load matter?

    Get PDF
    Executive control impairments in aphasia resulting from frontal lesions are expected, given that integrity of frontal regions is critical to executive control task performance. Yet the consistency of executive control impairments in aphasia is poorly understood. This is due to previous studies using only a brief set of measures or failing to account for the high language processing demands of many executive control tasks. This study investigated performance across a series of specific and broad executive control task, whilst comparing differences between low or high verbal task versions. Ten participants with aphasia secondary to left inferior frontal lesions and fifteen age matched controls completed a battery of verbal and low verbal executive control tasks tapping into the three core domains of inhibiting, switching, and updating of working memory. For both controls and participants with aphasia, there was no consistent influence of verbal load on either reaction time or accuracy performance. When compared to controls, participants with aphasia demonstrate a general slowing of responses across all reaction time tasks, and are less accurate on switching and updating tasks. These findings do suggest that language processing is not essential for executive control task performance, given that verbal load does not matter. Furthermore, tasks which involve holding multiple sources of information in mind, such as during switching or updating, are particularly vulnerable in aphasia
    corecore